Thursday, August 31, 2006

Amadeus forecasts 70% e-ticketing by the end of �06-2--J.

Amadeus forecasts 70% e-ticketing by the end of �06-2--J.: "Amadeus forecasts 70% e-ticketing by the end of �06


Seventy per cent of airline tickets issued through the Amadeus GDS will be electronic by the end of the year.

This represents a rise from the current figure of 64.5%, according to the company.

The GDS is an IATA preferred supplier for achieving paperless travel by 2007, and claims to be 'well on track' to complete this.

Amadeus enables electronic ticketing for 153 airlines in 138 countries, including 39 carriers so far this year and a further 20 by the end of 2006.

Antonella Vecchio, Alitalia's manager distribution and revenue management, said: 'Ninety-one per cent of our routes are now e-ticket-enabled and we expect to reduce the remaining 9% to four by the end of 2006, with a view to having 100% e-ticketing by 2007. We are very confident to reach this goal.'

Jos� Arribas, Iberia commercial logistics vice-president, said: 'As a result of our partnership with Amadeus, Iberia is very well positioned to reach IATA's 2007 objective.' "

Wednesday, August 30, 2006

Post Magazine - NU launches stripped down motor policy

Post Magazine - NU launches stripped down motor policy: "NU launches stripped down motor policy
Norwich Union has launched Simple Cover, a new online-only motor policy which strips out features it believes are unnecessary for many customers.
Policyholders will no longer have access to features like personal accident cover, medical expenses and physiotherapy cover, which NU claims will see significantly cheaper premiums.
Mark Godfrey, head of Norwich Union Direct Motor Marketing, said: �Easy and straightforward, Simple Cover is the perfect solution for time-poor, internet savvy motorists on the look-out for quality insurance at cheaper prices.� "

Walker Media resigns its Coca-Cola business - Media Bulletin - Media news by Email - Brand Republic

Walker Media resigns its Coca-Cola business - Media Bulletin - Media news by Email - Brand Republic: "LONDON - Walker Media has resigned its Coca-Cola Enterprises UK media planning and buying business, currently worth around �5m a year, and it is likely to go up for pitch. It had been with the agency for five years.
Industry sources say that CCE has become increasingly demanding of its media as it gears up for new launches. The spend attached to the brief made it difficult for Walker to meet those demands.
Walker held the business for the Capri-Sun and Appletiser brands for which Coca-Cola does the bottling in the UK. Other Coca-Cola-owned business in the UK, held by Vizeum, including the Nestea and Minute Maid brands, is unaaffected.
Earlier this month, CCE launched Capri-Sun 100% Juice to build on the growing campaign for healthier-option foods aimed at children. Available in orange and apple flavours, the drink contains no added sugar, sweeteners, additives or preservatives.
Last year, CCE's Appletiser signed a �1m deal with Channel 4 to sponsor re-runs of hit series Friends.
Walker has opted to rescind the account at a time when it is focused on an internal digital repositioning, after capturing the �70m Barclays brief earlier this year. Over the past few months, the agency has shied away from actively chasing new business as it staffs up on the digital side and beds in Barclays. With the finishing touches now being put on digital arm Walker-i, that phase looks to be nearing an end.
Last week, Walker-i, announced the launch of an affiliate programme called WASP, which stands for Walker-i's Affiliate Software Platform. The software will be able to run different campaign metrics including lead generation, cost-per-click and cost-per-acquisition.
Coca-Cola Enterprises"

Coca-Cola music to tap social networking trend - BR Bulletin - Advertising, Marketing, Media and PR news by Email - Brand Republic

Coca-Cola music to tap social networking trend - BR Bulletin - Advertising, Marketing, Media and PR news by Email - Brand Republic: "Coca-Cola music to tap social networking trend
by Nicola Clark Marketing 30 Aug 2006

Coke: tapping social networking phenomenonLONDON - Coca-Cola is poised to develop online communities as part of its digital music strategy, following its recent high-profile deal with Apple.
The soft-drinks giant already uses its music website, www.coca-cola.com/music, as a platform for unsigned artists and to podcast branded events, but insiders say it now plans to expand the channel to connect music fans worldwide.
A spokeswoman for Coca-Cola said it will use the global reach of its website, created by AKQA, but will also work with local partners to develop market-specific initiatives.
Coca-Cola was the first FMCG brand to launch a music-download service, Mycokemusic.com, in 2004. However, it axed the site in June in order to tie up with Apple and launch the new Coke-branded music destination.
The site's users can currently download music from iTunes with promotional codes. Insiders claim that the service will be expanded to include an interactive community function at the end of the promotion.
Earlier this month, Coca-Cola relaunched its main website to tie in with its 'Coke side of life' marketing platform. The company said the site was designed to give consumers a more inclusive role in its creative process."

Easy bourse - NEWS

Easy bourse - NEWS: Ryanair Calls On UK OFT To Break BAA Airport Monopoly
Thursday August 24th, 2006 / 14h31


Edited Press Release
LONDON -(Dow Jones)- Ryanair, the low-cost passenger airline, Thursday called on the U.K. Office of Fair Trading, or OFT, to recommend in its report to the Competition Commission the break-up of the BAA monopoly.
Ryanair was responding to an OFT study on the U.K. Airports market.
In its submission, Ryanair cited numerous abuses by the BAA in Stansted, which the CAA as regulator of the BAA airports has failed to address.
BAA's abuse of its dominance in the London airports has led to the development of inefficient, gold plated airport facilities and unnecessarily high prices for consumers, Ryanair said.
Ryanair's Head of Regulatory Affairs and Company Secretary, Jim Callaghan, said: "Ryanair has long called for the break up of the BAA airport monopoly, which is seriously damaging the competitiveness of the U.K. air transport market. BAA controls over 90% of London airport capacity and also dominates the Scottish airports market."
"We have detailed a number of abuses by the BAA that would justify a reference by the OFT to the Competition Commission and are calling on the OFT to recommend a break up of this monopoly as the most effective means of introducing competition into this important market", Callaghan said.

ATW: UK airlines push for BAA breakup

ATW: UK airlines push for BAA breakup: UK airlines push for BAA breakup
Friday August 25, 2006
British Airways, Ryanair and easyJet yesterday called on the UK Office of Fair Trading to refer its study on the UK airports market to the Competition Commission, citing monopolistic conditions in the market and calling for the breakup of the airports operator.OFT in June launched a consultation to determine whether the current market structure benefitted consumers after research showed that about two-thirds of UK air travelers--and nine out of 10 London passengers--fly through a BAA airport (ATWOnline, July 3). Interestingly, the UK House of Commons Transport Committee called for the breakup of BAA as far back as 1996, stating that Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted should not be run by the same company.

British Airways said in its submission to OFT that the Competition Commission should consider breaking up BAA. "Separate ownership of London Heathrow and London Stansted would make infrastructure developments at the airports more responsive to airlines' and their customers' needs and expansion at one airport would not be held back to suit the commercial needs of a monopoly owner," BA CEO Willie Walsh said.

The airline believes that decisions on new runway construction in southeast England should not be concentrated in the hands of one company. In the event of a BAA breakup, BA said there still will be a need for "strong" regulation to protect users against monopoly power, particularly at LHR and LGW.

Ryanair also called for dissolution of the BAA monopoly. "The CAA as regulator of the London airports has failed to prevent BAA from developing gold-plated facilities that do not meet the requirements of the airlines and their passengers and have led to inflated airport charges for consumers," Head of Regulatory Affairs and Secretary Jim Callaghan said. "[We] are calling on the OFT to recommend a breakup of this monopoly as the most effective means of introducing competition into this important market."

EasyJet said UK consumers must not pick up the bill for Ferrovial's acquisition of BAA (ATWOnline, June 9). "Consumers need better protection from the airport operators who behave like local monopolists, pushing up prices to hide their own inefficiencies. So, whilst easyJet supports the breakup of BAA, the primary focus must be on tougher regulation. The issue of ownership is secondary to providing the right regulatory regime," CEO Andy Harrison argued.

BAA says cosmetics restrictions here indefinitely

BAA says cosmetics restrictions here indefinitely: Tough restrictions on the carrying on board of cosmetics products will remain firmly in place as long as the UK government maintains the current security status for the country.

”We are looking at the wider issue and the most important factor is to maintain safety levels at all the airports we oversee in the UK,” said Mark Mann, a spokeperson for the British Airport Authorities (BAA).
”We are working in conjunction with the British Transport Police and it is their authority that dictates what restrictions apply according to the level of security alert,” Mann added.

Last week the government announced a reduction in the security level at UK airports from critical to severe, which led to widespread confusion amongst passengers traveling from UK airports. Many though that the reduction in security levels meant that they could go back to hand carrying cosmetics on board flights.

But Mann says that any confusions has now been overcome and that now queues at airport security checks are smaller and moving faster as a result of the dissemination of information to passengers making clear what passengers can and cannot carry on board.

”With regards cosmetics and toiletry products, we decided to make it clear-cut and have banned all products. Confusion arose from an initial ban that prevented passengers hand carrying gels and liquids on board. To prevent confusion we banned all personal care products.”

Perhaps the biggest impact to the cosmetic industry is the fact that passengers can no longer buy cosmetic products in UK airport lounges and take them on board flights. ”This restrictions also remains firmly in place and is likely to do so as long as the current security level is retained,” Mann said.

BAA owns and runs seven airports in the UK, including Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted, Southampton, Glasgow, Edinburgh and Stansted.

According to reports some of these airports have been a little more relaxed about implementing the full restrictions, particularly those related to the purchase of duty-free goods. Indeed at Birmingham International Airport, which is not owned by BAA, certain cosmetics products have been allowed through as hand carry items.

The restrictions have already prompted share prices in two leading cosmetic players, Elizabeth Arden and Estee Lauder, to drop on fears that the current restrictions, which have also been in force in other international airports, could effect sales.

The UK terror threat came about after British intelligence intercepted an alleged bomb plot which led to the arrest of 24 suspects on August 10.

According to reports a group of politically-motivated terrorist had plotted to blow up a number of airplanes in mid-flight from the UK to the US using liquid explosives.

Evidently these liquid explosives can be concealed in hand luggage and are also difficult to detect as an explosive using standard security measures. What's more, they can be easily disguised as every day cosmetic items, from a bottle of shampoo, to a fragrance bottle or even toothpaste.

BAA says cosmetics restrictions here indefinitely

BAA says cosmetics restrictions here indefinitely: Tough restrictions on the carrying on board of cosmetics products will remain firmly in place as long as the UK government maintains the current security status for the country.

”We are looking at the wider issue and the most important factor is to maintain safety levels at all the airports we oversee in the UK,” said Mark Mann, a spokeperson for the British Airport Authorities (BAA).
”We are working in conjunction with the British Transport Police and it is their authority that dictates what restrictions apply according to the level of security alert,” Mann added.

Last week the government announced a reduction in the security level at UK airports from critical to severe, which led to widespread confusion amongst passengers traveling from UK airports. Many though that the reduction in security levels meant that they could go back to hand carrying cosmetics on board flights.

But Mann says that any confusions has now been overcome and that now queues at airport security checks are smaller and moving faster as a result of the dissemination of information to passengers making clear what passengers can and cannot carry on board.

”With regards cosmetics and toiletry products, we decided to make it clear-cut and have banned all products. Confusion arose from an initial ban that prevented passengers hand carrying gels and liquids on board. To prevent confusion we banned all personal care products.”

Perhaps the biggest impact to the cosmetic industry is the fact that passengers can no longer buy cosmetic products in UK airport lounges and take them on board flights. ”This restrictions also remains firmly in place and is likely to do so as long as the current security level is retained,” Mann said.

BAA owns and runs seven airports in the UK, including Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted, Southampton, Glasgow, Edinburgh and Stansted.

According to reports some of these airports have been a little more relaxed about implementing the full restrictions, particularly those related to the purchase of duty-free goods. Indeed at Birmingham International Airport, which is not owned by BAA, certain cosmetics products have been allowed through as hand carry items.

The restrictions have already prompted share prices in two leading cosmetic players, Elizabeth Arden and Estee Lauder, to drop on fears that the current restrictions, which have also been in force in other international airports, could effect sales.

The UK terror threat came about after British intelligence intercepted an alleged bomb plot which led to the arrest of 24 suspects on August 10.

According to reports a group of politically-motivated terrorist had plotted to blow up a number of airplanes in mid-flight from the UK to the US using liquid explosives.

Evidently these liquid explosives can be concealed in hand luggage and are also difficult to detect as an explosive using standard security measures. What's more, they can be easily disguised as every day cosmetic items, from a bottle of shampoo, to a fragrance bottle or even toothpaste.

Raven Fox

Raven Fox: "Alpha wins Gatwick bond extension

29 August 2006 Print
By Emily Pacey (epacey@ravenfox.com) E-mail this article

BA extends contract with Alpha Flight Services to run its bonded stores at Gatwick airport

Alpha Flight Services has won an extension to its management contract with British Airways (BA) to run its bonded warehouse at London Gatwick airport until 2009.

The warehouse will be relocated from an airside location to Alpha's landside facilities this autumn. The move will coincide with the implementation of a new warehouse stock management system. The original site of the warehouse will be demolished and returned to BAA for redevelopment.

Alpha Flight Services UK and Ireland managing director Ken Adamson said: 'Alpha is a long-standing partner of BA at London Gatwick and the contract is a welcome extension of that relationship.

'Over the past twelve months Alpha has invested in upgraded bond facilities at Manchester, Birmingham and Dublin, and this further investment will ensure we have first class units and systems in place for the future.'"

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

NIG Newsletter

NIG Newsletter: "On 4 August we announced a healthy set of half year results, and along with the rest of RBS saw a strong half year performance. I am delighted that our business continues to grow in what has been a challenging soft market, and in July we saw our best ever trading month via our online channel, NIG Network. We now have over 2000 regular users, who have access to our entire range of commercial packages, which were featured in a successful marketing campaign launched in June this year.
Over the coming months we will continue to develop our electronic channels and in September we will launch the first NIG Motor Trade product on imarket, followed by a range of small package SME business, making it even easier for you to do business with us.
As well as expanding our online offering we have also strengthened our underwriting capability by recruiting leading talent in the industry, who will enable us to maximise our product offering. In this edition, I am pleased to introduce a number of new key appointments which include - David Cahoon, Head of Non Motor and John Inwood, Head of Complex Products & Technical Underwriting Support, who join Director of Underwriting & Pricing, Steve Kingshott's senior team.
Also this month we have introduced some new features which put London City office in the spotlight, an interview with Vivek Banga, Director of E-commerce and emerging channels, plus we give you the opportunity to ask our local NIG specialist his views on regulation and fire risk assessment.
Finally, if you would like to contribute to our online magazine or if you have any suggestions or stories you would like to see featured please let me know.
We look forward to hearing from you.

Charles Crawford
Managing Director, NIG"

NIG Newsletter

NIG Newsletter: "Speed, simplicity and efficiency is the mantra for the new millennium, and in our quest to offer leading edge service to our customers, we put the spotlight on trading on-line.

Vivek Banga - Head of eCommerce and Emerging Channels
The primary purpose of NIG�s eCommerce and Emerging Channels team is to offer online and electronic trading solutions to NIG's brokers, especially within the Commercial Lines market. The team works closely with our regional offices in the UK to increase broker awareness of NIG's electronic trading propositions and to encourage brokers to actively use these solutions.
N Magazine caught up with Vivek Banga to find out a little more
What are the main priorities in your role?
Ultimately, I am responsible for NIG�s online and electronically traded SME business. This includes investing in the right technology, products and marketing in addition to offering our brokers training and support in using online channels. I have to ensure that NIG�s online trading channels meet our brokers� expectations, deliver the benefits of speed and efficiency and provide brokers the support they need to trade with NIG online.

How are we doing in 2006?
NIG Network on-line quotes is used by nearly 2,000 brokers to quote and buy Commercial package business. We offer instantaneous quotes, policies and all key policy documents including Statement of Fact. Referrals are quickly dealt with by our local underwriters. All package products are available on NIG Network - Residential Property Owners, Commercial Property Owners, Office, Retailer, Tradesmen, Licensed Trade, Hotels and Business from Home.
We are also actively developing solutions with both software houses and with imarket to offer electronic package quotes straight from the broker back office systems.
A broker help desk team is available"

icBirmingham - BA challenges status of airport ownership

icBirmingham - BA challenges status of airport ownership: "BA challenges status of airport ownershipAug 25 2006




Fair competition chiefs should consider separate ownership of Heathrow and Stansted airports, British Airways said yesterday.
Airport operator BAA runs both airports as well as five others in the UK.
The Office of Fair Trading is currently looking at the whole question of the UK airport market.
In its response to an OFT consultation, BA said it should refer the matter to the Competition Commission.
BA added that the commission should consider 'the separate ownership of Heathrow and Stansted airports'."

Musings of a mobile marketer: Coca Cola embraces mobile marketing in Japan

Musings of a mobile marketer: Coca Cola embraces mobile marketing in Japan: "Coca Cola embraces mobile marketing in Japan
I saw this web page (it's in Japanese) and I figured it was showing how to pay for soft drinks with your mobile phone. So to double check, I asked my friend, Jan from W2forum, to translate it for me to make sure I'd got it right. I've got some screenshots here too.

It seems I did. There are two ways to pay - either oyster-card stylee with a 'wallet phone' which is pre-installed. Or if you have a less fancy phone, then you need to download an application you can charge up with credit and then you buy a drinks coupon. This displays as a QR code on your phone's screen. You then hold it up to the reader on the machine and you buy your drink.

Jan then adds that it has a rather interesting loyalty point scheme which he was just writing about in a report which I can share here.

'Coca Cola uses the mobile phone as a loyalty point system for their Cmode mobile-enabled drinks vending machines in Japan. consumers can use NFC (near field communication) or a QR code generated by an application installed on their phone to purchase drinks at Cmode vending machines. For each purchase, consumers earn loyalty points which are stored on their mobile phone. As the number of loyalty points increases, the consumer's loyalty ranking 'levels up' and the number of loyalty points earned per drink purchased also increases. Consumers can redeem loyalty points as free drinks at a vending machine, or on digital content such as screensavers and wallpapers at the Coca Cola mobile site. To use the loyalty scheme, consumers must first register to become a member of 'Club Cmode'. Club Cmode provides Coca Cola with the opportunity to interact with their consumers as well as promote new products and sell"

Friday, August 25, 2006

ZAMAN DAILY NEWSPAPER (2006082535941)

ZAMAN DAILY NEWSPAPER (2006082535941): A new deadline for BAA inquiry
Helia Ebrahimi, Mail on Sunday
20 August 2006
Reader comments (1)
TOP airlines have won an 11th hour extension to submit evidence for a watchdog's investigation into beleaguered airport operator BAA.



WANT TO KNOW MORE?AIR CHAOS: Latest advice
BLOG: My BA problem
Delayed? Don't fly into a rage
OTHER STORIESBT cuts off broadband firm
Co-op and Spar to fight Tesco
Market report: Friday 09.00
Apple recalls fire-fear batteries
Gas bills 'could fall' this winter
THE EDITOR'S PICKSInterest rates: The next move
Bank fees: Reclaim charges now
Credit card tip: Fee-free transfers
Fuel bills: Any point in switching?
Holidays: 50 ways to save

British Airways, easyJet and BMI asked the Office of Fair Trading to extend last Friday's deadline to this week so they could include comments on the fallout from this month's terrorist scare.


The move raises the pressure on BAA, which has been embroiled in a spiralling row with airlines over its handling of security measures during the terror alert.


The late submissions are expected to increase the level of criticism of BAA, which has already been attacked by other airline bosses.


Ryanair chief executive Michael O'Leary launched a fierce broadside last week and called for BAA to be broken up.


The OFT's investigation into BAA's dominant role in the UK's airport market was launched earlier this year and coincided with the £10bn takeover of the company by Spanish construction giant Ferrovial.


Despite a cautionary statement from the OFT in late May saying it was considering a full investigation into the British airports market, Ferrovial went ahead with its takeover.


At the outset of its inquiry, the OFT said it was open-minded about the outcome. But the growing pressure from airlines makes it more likely that the watchdog will refer the matter for a full investigation by the Competition Commission, which could break up BAA.


Insiders have voiced concern that BAA has a stranglehold over all elements of air travel - from security to duty-free shopping - at Heathrow, Stansted and Gatwick.


Virgin Atlantic, which made its submission in time for the original deadline, said it also wanted a full investigation by the Competition Commission into BAA's dominance.

ZAMAN DAILY NEWSPAPER (2006082535941)

ZAMAN DAILY NEWSPAPER (2006082535941): A new deadline for BAA inquiry
Helia Ebrahimi, Mail on Sunday
20 August 2006
Reader comments (1)
TOP airlines have won an 11th hour extension to submit evidence for a watchdog's investigation into beleaguered airport operator BAA.



WANT TO KNOW MORE?AIR CHAOS: Latest advice
BLOG: My BA problem
Delayed? Don't fly into a rage
OTHER STORIESBT cuts off broadband firm
Co-op and Spar to fight Tesco
Market report: Friday 09.00
Apple recalls fire-fear batteries
Gas bills 'could fall' this winter
THE EDITOR'S PICKSInterest rates: The next move
Bank fees: Reclaim charges now
Credit card tip: Fee-free transfers
Fuel bills: Any point in switching?
Holidays: 50 ways to save

British Airways, easyJet and BMI asked the Office of Fair Trading to extend last Friday's deadline to this week so they could include comments on the fallout from this month's terrorist scare.


The move raises the pressure on BAA, which has been embroiled in a spiralling row with airlines over its handling of security measures during the terror alert.


The late submissions are expected to increase the level of criticism of BAA, which has already been attacked by other airline bosses.


Ryanair chief executive Michael O'Leary launched a fierce broadside last week and called for BAA to be broken up.


The OFT's investigation into BAA's dominant role in the UK's airport market was launched earlier this year and coincided with the £10bn takeover of the company by Spanish construction giant Ferrovial.


Despite a cautionary statement from the OFT in late May saying it was considering a full investigation into the British airports market, Ferrovial went ahead with its takeover.


At the outset of its inquiry, the OFT said it was open-minded about the outcome. But the growing pressure from airlines makes it more likely that the watchdog will refer the matter for a full investigation by the Competition Commission, which could break up BAA.


Insiders have voiced concern that BAA has a stranglehold over all elements of air travel - from security to duty-free shopping - at Heathrow, Stansted and Gatwick.


Virgin Atlantic, which made its submission in time for the original deadline, said it also wanted a full investigation by the Competition Commission into BAA's dominance.

A new deadline for BAA inquiry | This is Money

A new deadline for BAA inquiry | This is Money: "A new deadline for BAA inquiry
Helia Ebrahimi, Mail on Sunday
20 August 2006
Reader comments (1)
TOP airlines have won an 11th hour extension to submit evidence for a watchdog's investigation into beleaguered airport operator BAA.



WANT TO KNOW MORE?AIR CHAOS: Latest advice
BLOG: My BA problem
Delayed? Don't fly into a rage
OTHER STORIESBT cuts off broadband firm
Co-op and Spar to fight Tesco
Market report: Friday 09.00
Apple recalls fire-fear batteries
Gas bills 'could fall' this winter
THE EDITOR'S PICKSInterest rates: The next move
Bank fees: Reclaim charges now
Credit card tip: Fee-free transfers
Fuel bills: Any point in switching?
Holidays: 50 ways to save

British Airways, easyJet and BMI asked the Office of Fair Trading to extend last Friday's deadline to this week so they could include comments on the fallout from this month's terrorist scare.


The move raises the pressure on BAA, which has been embroiled in a spiralling row with airlines over its handling of security measures during the terror alert.


The late submissions are expected to increase the level of criticism of BAA, which has already been attacked by other airline bosses.


Ryanair chief executive Michael O'Leary launched a fierce broadside last week and called for BAA to be broken up.


The OFT's investigation into BAA's dominant role in the UK's airport market was launched earlier this year and coincided with the £10bn takeover of the company by Spanish construction giant Ferrovial.


Despite a cautionary statement from the OFT in late May saying it was considering a full investigation into the British airports market, Ferrovial went ahead with its takeover.


At the outset of its inquiry, the OFT said it was open-minded about the outcome. But the growing pressure from airlines makes it more likely that the watchdog will refer the matter for a full investigation by the Competition Commission, which could break up BAA.


Insiders have voiced concern that BAA has a stranglehold over all elements of air travel - from security to duty-free shopping - at Heathrow, Stansted and Gatwick.


Virgin Atlantic, which made its submission in time for the original deadline, said it also wanted a full investigation by the Competition Commission into BAA's dominance.

Owner willing to give up London airports

Owner willing to give up London airports: "LONDON, England (UPI) -- Airport owner BAA Plc is prepared to relinquish control of London`s three major airports, the Daily Telegraph reported Saturday.
The company, which owns and operates seven major British airports and operates others worldwide, says it will give up control of London`s Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted airports in exchange for looser government regulations, the newspaper said.
The company, called the British Airports Authority until its 1986 privatization, is being investigated for monopolistic practices. Officials will appear before Britain`s Office of Fair Trading next week present its case against being broken up, the newspaper said.
BAA, owned by a Spanish consortium led by the Ferrovial Group of Madrid, also operates Indianapolis International Airport and has retail-management agreements at Baltimore-Washington, Boston Logan and Pittsburgh international airports."

Open skies deal could swamp us, BAA says - Industry sectors - Times Online

Open skies deal could swamp us, BAA says - Industry sectors - Times Online: Open skies deal could swamp us, BAA says
By Carl Mortished, International Business Editor



HEATHROW Airport would struggle to accommodate the big influx of US airlines that would follow an “open skies” treaty between America and the European Union, according to BAA, the owner of the airport.
Severe congestion at London’s main airport and scarcity of spare take-off and landing slots would place obstacles to new services even if the two sides were able to agree terms to liberalise the North Atlantic air transport market, BAA believes.



Opposition in the US Senate to ending restrictions on foreign ownership of US airlines is hindering the Bush Administration’s attempts to agree an open skies treaty with Europe, but a BAA internal briefing note seen by The Times reveals that Heathrow could barely cope with the hoped-for expansion of transatlantic flights.

According to BAA, demand already exceeds supply at Heathrow in landing slots and apron and terminal capacity. Its briefing note refers to advice by Airport Coordination Limited, the manager of take-off and landing slots at UK airports, which gave warning of scarce slot availability other than through slot trading between airlines.

US airlines will be forced to pay high prices — more than £10 million — for slots at peak early morning arrival times, but even then the slots will not be confirmed where there is a lack of parking for aircraft and terminal facilities. Delta Airlines recently agreed to pay United Airlines $20 million (£10.6 million) for route rights that will allow it to fly between New York and Gatwick. Delta has made clear its wish for a Heathrow service.

A BAA spokesman said that it expected carriers to attempt mass migration from Gatwick to Heathrow if and when an open skies deal is agreed. He said: “There are 30 Gatwick-US flights every day. They will want to come to Heathrow.”

Until the opening of Heathrow’s Terminal 5 in 2008, BAA reckons that it might have to split a new carrier’s service between more than one terminal or even split the arrival and departure elements of one service between two terminals. Its briefing note says: “The difficulties in communicating this arrangement to passengers, and the wayfinding difficulties faced by passengers themselves, would be unfortunate side- effects of such a step.”

A BAA official admitted that new traffic would bring difficulty. He said: “If open skies happens in the next two years, we physically don’t have capacity.”

Airlines condemn chaotic response by UK government and airport operators to 10 August foiled terror plot-22/08/2006-London-Flight International

Airlines condemn chaotic response by UK government and airport operators to 10 August foiled terror plot-22/08/2006-London-Flight International: "Airlines condemn chaotic response by UK government and airport operators to 10 August foiled terror plot
By David Learmount
IATA says airports must have stronger contingency plan
Airport authorities and the UK government have been condemned by airlines for the disruption caused to airports on 10 August by a suspected terrorist threat.
UK airports had no plans for coping with the raised national security threat level and the government has taken no responsibility for the disruption, even though 'the uncovered terrorist plot constituted a threat against states, not against airlines', says the Association of European Airlines (AEA).
The International Air Transport Association's chief executive Giovanni Bisignani says: 'In the case of BAA [owner of the three largest London airports] the airports must have a stronger contingency plan and be more proactive in handling the emergency.'


Hundreds of UK flights were cancelled following the 10 August alert

Bisignani says BAA should have been able to call on military and police resources to help in passenger processing. BAA responded that it would have had to bring in 50% more staff, and that this could not be done at short notice. British Airways' chief executive Willie Walsh described the scenes at London Heathrow airport as like 'a bad dream at Disneyland'. Ryanair chief executive Michael O'Leary has threatened to sue the government for compensation for the 270 flights he had to cancel because of 'farcical Keystone Cops security measures that don't add anything except to block up airports'.
AEA general secretary Ulrich Schulte-Strathaus says: "

Emergency! Anyone know how to run an airport? >> .:thebusinessonline.com:.

Emergency! Anyone know how to run an airport? >> .:thebusinessonline.com:.: Emergency! Anyone know how to run an airport?
By Ian Watson
20 August 2006


HEATHROW, Gatwick and other UK airports collapse into collective seizure. Thousands of passengers huddle in marquees for hour after hour. 20,000 items of luggage go missing. Hundreds of flights are cancelled. Some that manage to take to the air depart almost empty with their passengers left behind in queues waiting to clear security. Checked-in luggage is wheeled across a non-secure area of Gatwick. The queues, the flight cancellations continue 10 days after the terrorist flap first erupted.

What a picture to show the outside world of Britain in 2006.

Why, though, are British companies so incompetent when dealing with emergencies? The airlines blame airport operator BAA, now owned by Spanish concern Ferrovial, for the massive disruption to their schedules. BAA says “don’t blame us” and wants troops brought in to help with the new security rules. The government says no, and tells BAA to get its act together.

BAA must have known – or should have known – what the highest level of security alert would involve if ever enacted. It should have been ready with plans to meet the emergency. It was not. Neither were the airlines. As usual it was policy on the hoof.

British companies seem to grind to a halt at the first sign of crisis. Their highly paid executives freeze like rabbits caught in headlights. Two months after last summer’s strike ended at GateGourmet, which supplies British Airways with inflight catering, there was still no food for passengers on many BA flights. That incident exposed that BA had no back-up plan. One wonders what, if anything, the risk assessment officers in companies prone to strikes or other emergencies actually do.

In the weeks before the current terrorist alert, it was apparent to every airline passenger that Britain’s airports were woefully undermanned at every point from check-in to security and baggage handling. Even last week, at 1400 hours at Aberdeen airport, five days into the alert, there was only one BA employee checking in passengers. Yet there was BA’s chief executive, Willie Walsh, on the TV news blaming BAA for all the ills.


To every queuing passenger it has been blindingly obvious that BAA and the major airlines were understaffed even to cope with the expected traffic during the busiest holiday period of the year, never mind in the event of a security emergency. Tell-tale rope barriers, and winding queues of frustrated passengers, were testament to that. What was done to ease the holiday congestion? Nothing.

It was obvious too that John Reid, the Home Secretary, had gone into spinning mode when praising the travelling public for their forbearance and lack of complaints. A minute spent inside the marquees housing the massive passenger overspill at Heathrow would have quickly dispelled Reid of that notion.

Incredibly BAA claimed it was not its fault that such tough security measures were suddenly imposed. Hold on. Five years have passed since 9/11 and nothing that could not have been anticipated since then has been sprung on BAA or the airlines. Their executives must have been aware that one day a security alert on this scale would occur.

It’s also been apparent for some time that the UK’s main airports were at risk of going into meltdown should a terrorist attack – real or imagined – take place. Apparently not to BAA. Just a few months ago it stated, as part of its defence against Ferrovial’s takeover, that it was planning major cost efficiencies and some 700 job losses.

The crisis has illustrated the lack of effective contingency planning by those at the top of BAA and major airlines like BA. With breathtaking cheek the airlines are now demanding £250m in compensation from the government – yes that’s taxpayers’ money – for their own shortcomings.

It’s not hard to identify a prime contributor to the chaos. In a major article published during Ferrovial’s takeover battle for BAA, The Business highlighted that BAA had become more of a retailer than an airport operator. We revealed that BAA now made more money from its airports shops and from car parking fees than it did from aircraft landing charges and other airport services.
Years ago BAA realised that you don’t make any money from staff searching bags and lugging baggage around. The threat now is that Ferrovial, the new owner of our major airports, might make cuts in BAA’s investment programme. It borrowed almost £8bn to buy BAA and is already said to be reviewing BAA’s £9.5bn expenditure to upgrade London’s airports. It is also pushing for even more shops, bars and cafes to rake in money from passengers experiencing “dwell time” caused by flight delays.

For years BAA has successfully resisted calls from the airlines that it should be broken up, though whether that is a solution is unclear. What is clear is that, prior to the latest terrorist alert, capacity at Heathrow was already stretched to breaking point. The crisis has demonstrated the need for Heathrow’s new Terminal 5.

It wasn’t all bad news, though, for the legions of fed-up travellers at Heathrow and Gatwick. John Prescott, the deputy prime minister, chose to visit the tiny Humberside and Doncaster airports to see how they were coping with the crisis. They were doing OK – until he showed up.

www.bbj.hu :: Budapest Airport has a record summer

www.bbj.hu :: Budapest Airport has a record summer: "Budapest Airport has a record summer

18 Aug 2006 bbj.hu

BAA Plc's Budapest Airport reported its busiest month ever in July as more people arrived on incoming flights. Some 920,590 passengers were recorded at the airport in the month. The figure represents a 4.9% increase, or 43,245 more travelers, compared with a year ago, the company said in an e-mailed statement yesterday. For the 12 months to July 2006, total passenger traffic reached 8.196 million a 10.3% rise over the same period last year.
Traffic at Budapest's Ferihegy International Airport surged after budget carriers including Wizz Air Ltd. and EasyJet Plc began flying to Hungary following the country's European Union entry in May 2004. In July 2006, the number of air transport movements decreased by 0.4%, to 11,891 movements, compared with the same period last year. In the 12 months to July 2006, Ferihegy handled 127,151 air transport movements, a rise of 2.3% on the previous 12-month period.
'Budapest Airport is having a record summer, with strong growth in the number of passengers travelling through Ferihegy. This is fantastic news for Hungary's tourist industry, because many more overseas passengers are travelling to Hungary for leisure than Hungarian residents are travelling abroad' CEO Stewart Wingate said in the statement. BAA, the world's largest airport operator, operates seven UK airports and others in Italy and Australia. (Bloomberg, portfolio.hu)"

Virgin to call for competition inquiry into UK airports - Industry sectors - Times Online

Virgin to call for competition inquiry into UK airports - Industry sectors - Times Online: "Virgin to call for competition inquiry into UK airports
By Angela Jameson, Industrial Correspondent



VIRGIN ATLANTIC will call today for a Competition Commission inquiry into the British airports market, heaping further pressure on BAA, the beleaguered airports group.
The Times has learnt that Sir Richard Branson�s airline will make the request as part of its submission to the Office of Fair Trading�s airport markets study. Ryanair, which will make public its submission to the OFT today, is also expected to endorse steps towards a break-up of BAA.


Virgin is likely to stop short of calling for a full break-up of the airports operator but is expected to say that the airports market is so complicated that it demands a thorough investigation.
Analysts expect that the airlines will use last week�s disarray at airports to support their case for a break-up of BAA. One industry insider said: �It has been interesting that the three regulated London airports struggled the most. Luton was back to normal much more quickly than Stansted. It reinforces the question of why we need the group at all.�
Other industry sources said that there was already plenty of evidence, before the events of the past week, to support a break-up of BAA.
The Office of Fair Trading began its study into the airports market, which has a turnover of at least �2.6 billion, in June, pointing out that nearly two thirds of UK air passengers start or end their journeys at a BAA airport. Within the London area that figure rises to nine out of ten passengers.
EasyJet is also expected to use its submission to call for a break-up. It has said previously that an inquiry was �long overdue � there are too many cases where the ownership or "

Scotsman.com News - Scotland - Glasgow - Airport shops may be overhauled

Scotsman.com News - Scotland - Glasgow - Airport shops may be overhauled: "Airport shops may be overhauled
ALASTAIR JAMIESON
CONSUMER AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENT
PLANS to remodel Scotland's largest airport, so that more shops are located in secure areas, are being considered in the wake of new rules which severely restrict what passengers can take through security checks.
Passengers are prevented from carrying liquids through security, sending sales of soft drinks and gifts such as whisky, plummeting at shops which are located prior to screening in so-called 'landside' areas.
But shops in 'airside' areas have made a fortune as passengers stock up on food, water and duty free alcohol.
BAA is re-examining plans to alter the layout at Glasgow airport, where a large number of shops are still located landside.
Passengers would pass through security at an earlier stage than at present, allowing more shops and restaurants to be included in the secure area.
Among the planned benefits is the creation of a unified security searching area, replacing the three areas that exist at present.
It is understood the layout of Edinburgh and Aberdeen airports is unlikely to change. Among the few shops located landside at Edinburgh are Jenners and Boots.
The BAA spokesman stressed the Glasgow plans remained 'one of a number of options' and would be part of the long-term redevelopment of the airport."

Telegraph | Comment | Take the nightmare out of flying

Telegraph | Comment | Take the nightmare out of flying: Take the nightmare out of flying
By Graham Boynton


(Filed: 18/08/2006)

Comment on this story Read comments


Yet again, Britain's travellers are being asked to maintain their collective stiff upper lip in the face of more chaos, delays, cancellations and the wholesale misplacement of thousands of suitcases. Anecdotal evidence confirms that the travelling public has faced this bedlam with the fortitude and stoicism that won us world wars.

We are now entering the second week of disruption following the uncovering of an alleged plot to attack transatlantic airliners, but, although the flight schedules are returning to normal and Heathrow no longer looks like a Sudanese refugee camp, delays, uncertainty and ludicrous security scares are still with us.

It's enough to make you want to stop flying abroad on holiday, but we can't do that because we'll be giving in to terrorism - and, as we have displayed at our shambolic airports all week, we are made of sterner stuff.

advertisement
So, we have to find a better way of dealing with the terrorist threats that our Government warns us will be with us for the foreseeable future. Perhaps John Reid would like to take time out from his current role as the plain-speaking hard man of homeland security and consider some more intelligent strategies to protect an industry worth more than £30 billion a year, which provides his overtaxed, overworked constituents with much-deserved R-and-R in the sunshine.

First, British Airports Authority (BAA), which controls seven of our major airports, including Heathrow, was clearly not prepared for the new security directive issued in the early hours of last Thursday morning.

In fact, travelling through Heathrow on a normal day makes one wonder if there are ever enough security personnel on duty at any time. There are always long queues, there are invariably x-ray machines standing idle, and yet, as Charles Graham, chief executive of Europa Capital and a frequent Heathrow user, pointed out this week, once you have passed through the tortuously slow screening process, you emerge into a glittering world of duty-free shops and shiny, expensive food and beverage outlets that suggest "BAA runs its airports as highly profitable shopping centres, merely masquerading as an airport operator".

Secondly, under the current system, our aviation security is paid for by the airports, the airlines and ultimately the travelling public in the form of passenger charges on every ticket. This is not the case with road, ferry or train passengers, all of whom in theory are protected by the government.

And yet the potential attacks directed at airline passengers are surely issues of national security as much as are those directed at coach or rail travellers; and, on past evidence, it is the fliers who are the prime targets for the current crop of terrorists. As Giovanni Bisignani, chief executive of the International Air Transport Association, said yesterday, the BAA should have asked for assistance from national security authorities and the military.

Thirdly, the international aviation industry's most successful preventative anti-terrorist programme is, not surprisingly, operated by El Al. For the past 35 years, the Israeli national carrier has based its security on profiling, and, although it does not discuss security issues, it is known to have caught potential hijackers and bombers attempting to board their aircraft.

Famously, it intercepted a pregnant Irish woman whose Palestinian boyfriend had, unbeknown to her, packed her luggage with explosives. The problem is that profiling has all manner of human rights issues attached and requires highly trained, sophisticated (and, therefore, relatively expensive) security staff, but that surely is worth the money when you consider the folly of having to emergency-land a United Airlines jet in Boston, as happened this week, because a middle-aged woman developed claustrophobia in flight while carrying a jar of face cream that airport security had failed to pick up.

Although fortitude and stoicism have been displayed on a grand scale throughout this past week, there is mounting evidence that travellers are beginning to tire of the hassles that have become part of the travel experience since 9/11.

Travellers to America, particularly, feel besieged, and, while global air travel to the rest of the world has continued to rise since then, figures from the Civil Aviation Authority show that the number of Britons visiting America has fallen. Florida, which was once our most popular destination for family holidays, is doing particularly badly and is 20 per cent down on last year, while, this June, 46,000 fewer British holidaymakers flew to America than in the same month last year. The most common complaint - apart from the long queues - is that visitors are made to feel like criminals by heavy-handed immigration officials.

Next week, I am flying to New York and I am facing that trip with some trepidation. Not because I fear I shall be blown out of the skies, but because the already painful process of passing through British and American airports will most probably be even more painful.

Yesterday, US Homeland Security officials demanded that passenger information for all flights between Britain and America be provided before aircraft take off, which probably means even more delays, because it is common for passengers to be added to the manifest at the last minute, particularly if they are transferring from a connecting flight.

And, of course, once the aircraft has finally taken off, there is a chance that one of my fellow passengers may take a funny turn, start behaving erratically, and be perceived as a security threat. At which point, we'll probably have to divert to some God-forsaken airport in the middle of Canada, all be de-planed and be subjected to invasive body searches and so on and on and on. But at least we'll be safe.

Before this travel nightmare becomes a daily reality, the Government, BAA, the airlines and our security services need to get together and find a consistent, coherent security system that minimises inconvenience to both a now-vulnerable industry and the travelling public. Without one, we'll just have to stay at home.

TheMoodieReport.com

TheMoodieReport.com: Mark Riches welcomes overnight improvements in UK terror alert – ‘almost business as normal’ – but calls for lessons to be learned – 14/08/06
Source: ©The Moodie Report
By Martin Moodie
Email Print

Mark Riches: "We’re where we want to be without compromising in any way the security and safety of our passengers”
UK. World Duty Free Managing Director Mark Riches has welcomed the dramatic overnight news that the UK terror alert has been downgraded from ‘critical’ to ‘severe’. As a result of that, the Department of Transport has eased hand baggage restrictions on flights out of the UK, though certain limitations (click here for details) still apply to US-bound flights.

BAA said overnight through the media that it will need to phase in the changes and will not be implementing the new rules on hand luggage at its seven airports until Tuesday morning.

En route to his office this morning Riches told The Moodie Report: “There is progress, yes. And some clarity is emerging about the situation with hand baggage. But there is still some confusion about the landside search situation and what they can buy on the other side.”

But Riches had a simple message for the trade and for travellers in terms of duty free purchasing – “unless you’re travelling to the US it’s business as normal”.

One frustration, though Riches declined to comment, is that some airlines (not just in the UK but elsewhere) have continued to sell duty free onboard while applying their own tailored bans to duty free carry-ons (not just on US flights).

"Unless you’re travelling to the US it’s business as normal"
Mark Riches,
Managing Director, World Duty Free
Riches said while he felt a lot better about the situation today he would be happier still when he knew that BAA’s customers were getting a single message from all parties. “If the airports and the airlines can speak with a single voice and communicate better with the consumer it will be so much better.”

Reflecting on the state of the duty free and travel retail sector four days after the crisis began Riches said: “I’d have thought that we are in as good a shape as can be, bearing in mind the severity of what has happened.

"We’re basically where we want to be without compromising in any way the security and safety of our passengers.”

EXPRESS YOUR VIEWS

How has the travel retail industry reacted to the crisis? How bad was the situation? Is this a defining moment in the trade's history? Have your say - attributed or anonymous - on The Moodie Report Forum. Comment
But he said the travel retail sector needed to reflect on what had happened and ensure it is able to take a “pro-active” stance and “be ahead of the agenda” in the event of future crises.

Alpha Airports Group Executive Director David King said the biggest problem facing his business was that many airlines were "doing their own thing" in terms of applying varying onboard restrictions. "The big issue is consistency and simplicity - they are the two big things that make the difference," he told The Moodie Report.

He agreed though that the situation appears to be resolving itself in the UK. But he cautioned: "The issue then becomes what is happening around the world. It's the various interpretations that are making things difficult."

::: u.tv :::

::: u.tv :::: "Airport retailers' duty free relief

The decision to allow air passengers to take goods bought from duty free shops on to planes has come as a huge relief to airport retailers.




VIDEOCOMMENTS HOT TOPICRELATED STORIES




There had been fears that airside shops would see a dramatic drop in sales following the introduction of strict new anti-terror measures banning travellers from carrying hand-luggage on to aircraft.

But yesterday the rules were eased to allow items bought in the departure lounge to be carried on to planes.

BAA, the airports operator, put up notices telling passengers that they could buy any goods from shops in departure lounges, including liquids and electrical items.

However US airlines have maintained a ban on carrying liquids on to planes bound for America.

A BAA spokeswoman said airside purchases had been through necessary security checks and so were deemed safe to take on to aircraft.

The decision was a welcome move for passengers who had faced the prospect of lengthy flights with little or no entertainment.

It also prompted retailers to re-asses their stock.

Boots, which has stores in many UK airports, has seen a shift in the type of goods people are buying.

A spokeswoman said stores had stocked up on sandwiches, drinks, nappies and baby wipes to meet the demand.

'We are selling a lot more short term purchases, things that people will want over a period of a couple of hours,' she said.

'As soon as we knew of the change in the security rules, within a matter of hours we had changed deliveries and stock supplies anticipating that people who are airside would be in a much more uncomfortable position than those landside.'

She said it was too earl"

Chaos, incompetence and dangerous drivel | the Daily Mail

Chaos, incompetence and dangerous drivel | the Daily Mail: "Chaos, incompetence and dangerous drivel
Last updated at 08:17am on 16th August 2006

Reader comments (7)

Enjoy our blogsBenedict Brogan's blog
Baz Bamigboye's blog
Fashion blog
Peter Hitchens
Showbiz
Frank Barrett's travel blog
Don't miss todayNews: Illegal migrants working at the Home Office
Comment: A shabby handout for the Royal Mail
Water firm decides against drought order
Have your sayIn the wake of the sex offenders scandal, are you worried about your children's safety at school?
Yes - we don't know who is in schools
No - there's little or no danger
More polls » How depressing that some of the most inflammatory nonsense spouted since last week's terrorist alert should have come from a British police officer.

'What you are suggesting,' said Chief Superintendent Ali Dizaei on BBC2' s Newsnight, 'is that we should have a new offence in this country called "travelling whilst Asian".'

A catchy soundbite, perhaps. But dangerous drivel all the same.

Mr Dizaei was answering an advocate of 'suspect profiling', the system under which airport security staff concentrate their most rigorous checks on passengers whose appearance or behaviour patterns may give grounds for suspicion.

Of course, the Mail has qualms about the system, since it inevitably means innocent young male Asians having to suffer the greatest inconvenience.

But Mr Dizaei is utterly disingenuous when he says: 'Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma bomber, would have certainly gone through the security system because he was a white male.'

There is no 'certainly' about it. Mr Dizaei knows full well - or he damn well ought to have found out before opening his mouth - that profiling has become a sophisticated psychological science over the years.

Its practitioners are quite as aware as this preposterous policeman that terrorists come in all shapes, sizes and colours. By no means do they restrict their in-depth searches to members of only one race, sex or age group.

As for suggesting that profiling will 'alienate communities', isn't Mr Dizaei risking exactly that when he plants the idea in the minds of British Asians that they have reason to take offence? Isn't it a policeman's job to allay such fears, rather than fuel them?

Fair-minded Asians everywhere accept the logic behind profiling. They understand, too, that an effective security system will protect them as much as any other passengers.

True, profiling should be carried out with the utmost tact and courtesy. But David Cameron was right not to rule it out in his excellent speech yesterday on the Muslim fundamentalist threat to our way of life and the Government's woeful response to it.

What a pity Mr Dizaei - posturing for the BBC cameras in his police uniform, as if he speaks for anybody but himself - cannot show the same common sense. Can anyone come up with a safer or more effective way of ending the chaos at our airports?

Which brings us to another man who has been talking blatant rot since last Thursday's arrests. How could Stephen Nelson, chief executive of airport operator BAA, have the sheer brass neck to claim: 'For the most part we have had absolutely the right numbers of people. . . we have coped magnificently.'

The right numbers? When early yesterday only four of the 14 security stations for which he is responsible at Stansted airport were open, while passengers were made to endure endless queues?

Coped magnificently? When, seven days and thousands of disrupted holidays after the alert, flights are still being cancelled? When confusion still reigns over officious hand-baggage restrictions, described by Ryanair as 'nonsensical'? And when 20,000 items of luggage have gone missing at Heathrow alone?

Since 9/ 11, BAA has had five years to prepare contingency plans for times of heightened threat like these. Yes, five years. But still it seems to have been completely unprepared.

The company makes most of its profits from airport shops and car parks. Indeed, it has a strong vested interest in keeping passengers hanging around.

Isn't it time, for the sake of all frustrated holidaymakers and business fliers, to put airport security into more efficient hands?

Air fair - Comment - Times Online

Air fair - Comment - Times Online: Air fair
The world’s most important airport has failed a crucial test




While the police investigation into the alleged terror plot directed against flights from Britain continues, so does the extreme inconvenience being experienced by hundreds of thousands of aspiring passengers. There is a widespread appreciation that enhanced security measures are necessary, but immense and legitimate frustration at cancellations and delays. These are occurring at a rate that seems excessive, not least to passengers being held, sometimes for hours, outside terminal buildings. One apparent way of reducing congestion inside terminals is to lock passengers out. This has driven the leading airlines, notably BA, to issue unusual public criticism of the British Airports Authority (BAA).
It is not unreasonable to ask for patience. The nature of the threat, and that arrests had to be made earlier than anticipated, mean that strict measures at airports are required. These may well be relaxed in the next few days. Questions must then be asked about about how airports are to be equipped to meet the inevitable challenges of the future.



The present difficulties have, however, been made worse by inadequate communications. It has not been made sufficiently clear to passengers precisely what they are allowed to carry on board and where they are permitted to bring those items from. Books, for example, are, somewhat curiously, banned on flights to the US but allowed for other trips from Heathrow, provided that they are purchased after passing through security. At smaller, typically short-haul, airports, reading matter brought from home is not deemed a danger. BAA should by now have clarified the position.

What may, and may not, be carried in a clear plastic bag is only part of the problem. The principal cause of delays is the understandable demand that passengers are subjected to a full body search rather than waved through if they do not set off a metal detector. On this matter, BA and Ryanair, among others, have a wholly valid point when they ask that army reservists, community support officers, private firms or retired airport security workers should be asked to assist existing staff. It is extraordinary that BAA has no adequate staff contingency plans for emergency periods that have become a part of modern life.

Staff policing Heathrow doors yesterday were hopelessly ill-informed and were seemingly unable to communicate what little information they did have to the huddled masses. The Department for Transport should satisfy itself that BAA has learnt from these mistakes — the company moved quickly to safeguard duty-free sales, but has been far too slow to ease the burden on passengers.

Ministers should also be as frank as they can be about their longer-term thinking. It would not be viewed as an outrage if items that could be converted into detonators — laptop computers, mobile telephones, iPods and cameras — were banished from hand luggage. But the public must be treated like adults, and the new rules must be clearly explained. That process needs to start now at Heathrow.

BAA says Ferrovial has faith in decision to buy - Industry sectors - Times Online

BAA says Ferrovial has faith in decision to buy - Industry sectors - Times Online: "BAA says Ferrovial has faith in decision to buy
By Angela Jameson and David Robertson



BAA, the owner of Heathrow, has dismissed fears that its new Spanish owners, Ferrovial, may be rethinking their �10.3 billion purchase of the airport group.
Ferrovial�s shares plunged 7 per cent this week, as investors reacted to news that a plot to blow up transatlantic aircraft in flight had been foiled and that passengers at British airports would be subject to strict new security measures.


Analysts speculated that retail businesses at BAA�s airports would suffer if long-term restrictions on hand luggage succeeded in deterring passengers from flying.
Ferrovial has had control of the British airports group since July 29 and shares in the company will be delisted on Tuesday. Ferrovial said that it was far too early to know what impact any new measures might have on the business.
BAA�s revenues from retail reached �862 million last year, of which �385 million came from its subsidiary, World Duty Free.
A spokesman for BAA in London said: �The people in Spain paid the price they did beacuse they have confidence in their approach. They have said that they will let them get on with running the business.�
But analysts said that given Ferrovial�s highly geared purchase of the airport group any fall in revenues could cause problems. Gert Zonneveld, analyst at Panmure Gordon, said: �If no duty free drinks are available that is quite a severe impact because it�s such a money maker. If airports see revenue from this decline they may have to increase the landing fees they charge to recover that income.� "

Guardian Unlimited Business | | Airport retailers face uncertain future

Guardian Unlimited Business | | Airport retailers face uncertain future: Airport retailers face uncertain future

Mark Tran
Friday August 11, 2006
Guardian Unlimited


New airport security measures in place following the disclosure of an alleged plot to bomb transatlantic flights pose severe challenges to retailers and airport operators, analysts said today.
WH Smith, a major airport retailer, today saw its shares dip 1.4% at 474.75p. The fall came amid fears that the measures - which forbid liquids, including bottled water, and books from being taken on flights - will hit sales.

Retail outlets are a lucrative source of revenue for airport authorities and shop chains because travellers are a captive market. Last year, outlets earned the UK airports operator BAA £800m and are its single greatest source of revenue.


Article continues

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Heathrow, Gatwick and Manchester - all operated by BAA - are among the top 10 airports for duty free and travel retail sales.
Retailers selling alcohol and perfume face particular difficulties, at least in the short term.

According to Group Generation, which tracks the travel retail sector, worldwide sales of duty free shops totalled $27bn (£14.2bn) in 2005. Alcohol, cosmetics and perfume represented 50.5% of total sales.

"The uncertainty ... and the uneven enforcement of the ban could cause a 30 to 40% decline in sales at some stores," C Britt Beemer, the chairman of America's Research Group, told the Associated Press.

For the time being, US authorities have banned all liquids and gels from hand luggage.

While details of the alleged bombing plot remain sketchy, experts say several types of liquid explosives could have been involved.

It has been reported that explosive devices would have consisted of a liquid, a powder and an electronic detonator, possibly concealed in an iPod or mobile phone.

The setback to airport retailers follows periods of strong sales at airports. Increased security measures following the September 11 attacks on the US boosted business, with travellers forced to get to airports earlier and whiling away the extra time by shopping.

The paring back of free drinks and meals on flights also encouraged people to stock up on food and water from retailers before boarding.

Some experts expect only a short-term impact on retailers once the new regulations are clarified and shops adapt to them. For example, purchased goods could be transported to aircraft hold areas and then collected by passengers upon arrival.

"If I was WH Smith I wouldn't be too worried," said Neil Thompson, director of security at the security consultancy Red24, "there will be huge pressure from BAA and retailers to get things back to normal. Laptops and mobile phones will be allowed back on, but there will have to be second searches before you board the plane. Things will take longer, but people will accept that in these more dangerous times."

Express & Star Midlands Life: West Midlands features, people and places

Express & Star Midlands Life: West Midlands features, people and places: "Gridlock at internet check-in desks
Aug 10, 2006
While it is undoubtedly one of the cornerstones of modern communication, the web's major flaw was demonstrated again today following the announcement of increased security measures at UK airports after an alleged terror threat.

Fundamentally, it's not that different to an airline check-in desk.

The queue can only accomodate so many people and if there's a huge throng coming from all angles and milling around, individual requests for service take time and, eventually, someone's going to pull down the shutters. It was a bit like that on the British Airport Authority's websites this morning.

The main site www.baa.co.uk seemed a little slow to access, but the key site, www.heathrow

airport. com ground to a halt.

The BAA runs seven UK airports, including Heathrow, Gatwick, Stanstead and Glasgow. Contacting any of the major ones via the web this morning for information on the nature of the terror threat and advice on what to do about it was pretty much a waste of time.

There was no notice of the threat off the home page of the BAA, even, which may be because the design for that particular page is fixed and not flexible enough for a fast news update. Others, however, had managed to offer more or less information on their websites.

At Birmingham, www.bhx.co.uk the major part of the home page remained unchanged, except for a "Heightened security measures" headline under the news section.

From there you could link through to another page which said: "Passengers travelling through Birmingham International Airport should be aware of heightened security measures across the UK that are in place. Please click on 'Read the Press Release' to the right of this page." Technically, that would comply with the web design gurus' "three-click rule" which aims to get you to any particular piece of information within three clicks.

Once you get there, mind, the tone of the press release is calm and measured and the information appears to be all there as it relates to passengers' travel experience.

It was a similar process for Coventry Airport at www.coventryairport.co.uk, which has a link directly off the front page and a relatively brief explanation on click-through.

But there was a completely different approach from Nottingham East Midlands, which opted for much more direct action.

The site immediately redirects to www.nottinghamema.com/security-announcement.html with a more comprehensive rundown of the security measures in place, advice to passengers and some useful telephone numbers.

I was able to check all three, by the way before I received a message that my connection to www.heathrow

aiport.com had been reset.

Passengers looking for information from our closest airports in the north west would have been disappointed.

There was not a dicky bird at the front desk of https://www.manchesterairport.co.uk, nor on their passenger and visitor information page. In the end, I gave up looking.

Nothing, either, at Liverpool John Lennon at http://www.liverpooljohnlennonairport.com, although there was a pop-up survey asking where you would like to fly to.

The answer is probably: "Anywhere, but not today."

The full text of the Home Secretary's statement on the terror alert can be read at http://www.homeoffice. gov.uk/about-us/news/373144.

Part of it says that "at 2am this morning the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre raised the UK threat state to its highest level - 'CRITICAL'."

Interesting that the threat was upped at 2am once arrests had been made. Also that there are reports that news of the change in threat didn't make the official government websites until closer to 6am.

TheMoodieReport.com

TheMoodieReport.com Duty free industry woes intensify amid terror alert; Dominican Republic stops sales; BA withdraws service; InterBaires hit – 11/08/06
Source: ©The Moodie Report
By Martin Moodie
Email Print

Enrique Urioste, CEO, Interbaires: Around 4-5% of sales are being lost daily by the banning of liquid or gel-related items on US flights
Photo by Salina Christmas
INTERNATIONAL. The impact of this week’s unprecedented terror alert in the UK on the duty free industry is intensifying around the world.

Luis Sansón of Tienda Ritana Duty Free in the Dominican Republic advised The Moodie Report that all sales of liquor and fragrances have now been banned for all flights, not just those to the US.

At Puerto Plata`s International Airport “cigarettes are the only item we sold yesterday” he said.

“Hopefully the ban, will be eliminated or reduced soon, as it has affected the sales of all the duty free stores operators,” Sansón said.

As reported earlier, British Airways has today withdrawn its entire duty and tax free range from all flights, preferring to give priority to serving passengers food and drink.

In Argentina, Enrique Urioste, CEO of airport retailer Interbaires said that around 4-5% of sales were being lost daily by the banning of liquid or gel-related items on US flights (affecting wine, spirits, fragrances and cosmetics). But the impact was actually much bigger than that he said, due to the growing “paranoia” among passengers using the airport.

"If we isolate US destination flights then it would only be 4-5% of sales because passengers on those flights usually buy more sunglasses and accessories. But the overall effect is much worse."
Enrique Urioste, CEO, InterBaires
“The impact on the business started yesterday. If we isolate US destination flights and the banned products then it would only be 4-5% of sales because passengers on those flights usually buy more sunglasses and accessories. But the overall effect is much worse,” he said.

“Yesterday non-American carriers going to the US added the restrictive measures as well.”

Urioste said the company is investigating various security measures that will allow it to sell to all passengers in future. He said he was anxious to talk to counterparts around the world about the way forward.

Other retailers have already begun discussions with national authorities and with airlines, in a bid to overcome the new regulations. At Dublin Airport, Aer Rianta Retail is examining how it might package duty free purchases and deliver them to aircraft for transport in the hold, to be collected by passengers on arrival at their destination.

HAVE YOUR SAY

How should the travel retail industry react to the current crisis? How bad is it? Is this a defining moment in the trade's history? Have your say - attributed or anonymous - on The Moodie Report Forum. Comment
In the US, the International Association of Airport Duty Free Stores is urgently seeking clarification from the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) on whether it can alter the delivery process from airport stores to aircraft.

IAADFS Executive Director Michael Payne tells The Moodie Report: “The situation is very fluid and there is no consistent practice or enforcement of particular measures at the moment. It really depends on how the local authorities, operators and TSA people on the ground are working together. In those situations where they have the opportunity to sit down, talk and arrive at a workable solution, it seems the outcomes are satisfactory for the business.

“Some locations are allowing planeside delivery from the stores, some are even allowing cash and carry, but there is real variation in what is being implemented. There are even flights where crew are taking purchases and handing them to passengers onboard.”

“Our priority is to talk to the TSA and to get an accurate picture of how things are evolving. As an industry we need to reinforce the security of duty free, which is incredibly well regulated.”

"Canadian airside stores are prohibited from selling any liquids, including Canada’s most popular export, maple syrup."

HDS Retail, which operates more than 100 Relay airport shops in Canada and the US, reports that it is being hit hard by the restrictions. President and CEO Jean-Baptiste Morin says the ban on products allowed onboard has “been a major hit for us.”

He estimates losses of around US$30,000 a day in beverage sales, a business with annual revenues of US$10-15 million a year. Two of the group’s Fruits and Passions airport stores (one in Toronto, one in Montreal), which carry beauty items, have had to shut down, as most products contain liquid. Morin says each store sold approximately US$5,000 a day in sales.

Aside from the banning of beverages, health and beauty aids sold at the company’s stores are also left sitting on the shelves. Morin estimates the prohibited items make up 15% of Relay’s store stock.

Morin says the restrictions imposed by the Canadian authorities are even tighter than in the US, but adds: "What is a bit frustrating is there is no consensus on what measures must be enforced.”

He says beverages in some US airside stores can be sold, however, a sign warns passengers that they must be consumed before boarding. Canadian airside stores are prohibited from selling any liquids, including Canada’s most popular export, maple syrup. “In some cases, we’ve just removed stock from the shelves,” he says. Morin says maple syrup was “the top seller” in the gourmet and souvenir category.

When asked when he thought some of the restrictions might be lifted, he says: “Your guess is as good as mine. We are hoping for a more flexible situation.”

HDS is part of the same group as French travel retailer Aelia, which operates duty free stores at Paris Charles de Gaulle and Orly airports, among others. Aelia Vice-President Organisation and Development Ambroise Fondeur says: "The French authorities have banned the sales of liquor and perfumes on all flights going to the US, UK and Israel. We are obviously monitoring the situation very closely. We anticipate things will evolve in the coming days but have no visibility on how long it will last."

Fraport confirms to The Moodie Report that liquor and fragrances cannot be sold to passengers travelling to the US or to British Airways passengers travelling to the UK. US and UK passengers make up 20% of all traffic at Frankfurt so the airport is keen to see the situation ease.

Gebr Heinemann co-owner Gunnar Heinemann said in an interview with German weekly Der Spiegel on Friday: “This affects us quite severely. We can just be thankful that the plot was discovered in time.”

Should the restrictions be widened beyond US-bound flights, said Heinemann, it would provide a big headache for the business. Fragrances and cosmetics are 40-50% of Heinemann sales, he said, with liquor a further 20%.

But he also backed the industry stance that duty free remains a safe, secure environment. The business has long been used to special packaging and extra security measures imposed on its products, he said. “We have a security system that means nobody can tamper with products in our stores,” he said.

Click here for our overnight global round-up of the crisis' impact on duty free, constantly updated through the day.

Raven Fox

Raven Fox: "British Airways has voluntarily removed its duty-free offer from all its aircraft leaving UK airports

British Airways has confirmed to RavenFox.com that it has voluntarily removed all its duty-free goods from every one of its aircrafts leaving the UK.
A British Airways spokesperson said: 'We considered just making it applicable for US-bound aircraft but have decided for our own safety and for passengers' safety to remove the entire duty-free programme for every flight.'
'This is for a number of reasons. Passengers are unable to carry liquid onboard with them. This means that they aren't able to bring their own bottles of water with them for long-haul or short-haul flights. We are in the process of restocking every trolley with extra food and beverage provisions to give out to passengers.'
While airport security measures impinge on groundstore liquor and fragrance sales, airline sales should be booming. Current security rules mean that airlines are still able to continue selling onboard, including liquor and fragrances.
British Airways' voluntary removal of its duty-free programme is in contrast to the stance taken by long-haul rival Virgin Atlantic. Earlier today Virgin Atlantic confirmed to RavenFox.com that duty-free sales are booming as a direct result of stringent airport security, especially the ruling that duty-free liquor must be consumed before boarding.
The impossible ruling that fragrances must be consumed before boarding is also having a direct result on sales in Virgin Atlantic's beauty category, a spokesperson for the airline said.
The Department for Transport confirmed to RavenFox.com that heightened security measures at UK airports 'may remain for some time. While we are at this critical level of security I foresee that we will continue to maintain the stance we have taken."

TheMoodieReport.com

Monitoring the impact on duty free: Global reaction to UK terror crisis – 11/08/06
Source: ©The Moodie Report
By Martin Moodie
Email Print
"We do absolutely everything by the book.
It is a totally compliant business."
John Brocklebank, Managing Director UK and Eire, The Nuance Group
UK/INTERNATIONAL. The short-term impact from yesterday’s terror crisis in the UK on several key categories in the global travel retail industry is likely to be severe. But analysts and industry executives are divided in their opinions regarding the longer-term impact.

Industry insiders are hoping for a swift return to normality, arguing the travel retail business is a highly-resilient and compliant one, subject to the strictest of scrutinies at every stage of the supply and purchasing chain. Executives such as World Duty Free Managing Director Mark Riches called for "cool heads" and urged against over-reaction.

Nonetheless, yesterday was undoubtedly the toughest day in the global duty free industry since 9/11 with spirits, wine, fragrance, cosmetics and consumer technology all bearing the brunt of the response to the alleged airline bombing plot.

Airports and airlines around the world operating US-bound flights stopped a number of categories from either being purchased or taken onboard. At the request of the TSA, duty free liquor and fragrance are not being sold to US-bound passengers anywhere in the world.

"We’re entering discussions with the airlines about whether it’s possible to sell product to passengers, then deliver it to the gates and have it put in the hold."
Frank O'Connell, Director-Retail, Aer Rianta Retail
In the UK, due to fears of liquid explosives being at the heart of the planned bombings, liquid-based items such as fragrance, spirits, wine and water were at the heart of the crackdown – mainly on US-bound flights but in some cases on a wider basis as retailers waited for guidelines amid widespread confusion.

Electronics sales were also directly impacted as consumer technology items were banned from carry-on. Yesterday afternoon BAA and World Duty Free stopped selling any retail items at all for carry-on by US-bound passengers in an effort to help their operational colleagues cope with the crisis.

But while airport stores cannot sell duty free liquor or fragrance to US-bound passengers, there appears to be no such restriction - yet - to inflight sales. Many carriers are still selling liquor and fragrance on US routes, product that comes from the same bonded stores as that sold in airport shops.

In this special report, which will be updated throughout the day, we present a snapshot of the latest developments and reaction from the world media. We also examine duty free's level of security and regulatory compliancy - vital arguments as the channel comes under unprecedented scrutiny.

EUROPE



British Airways has withdrawn its entire duty and tax free range on all flights. The duty free trolleys are now being used for catering purposes
Photos courtesy of British Airways
At the request of the US Government, no airport is selling duty free liquor or fragrance to US-bound passengers. The move appears to be open-ended, with no indication of when the restriction might be removed. With the exception of US flights, there are no sales restrictions in place.

Airlines have been largely unaffected but today British Airways revealed it had withdrawn its entire duty and tax free range on all flights. A spokesperson told The Moodie Report that the decision was made on logistical grounds as priority had to be given to serving passengers food and drinks. The duty free trolleys are being used for catering purposes. British Airways operates 39 flights to 14 US cities daily out of London Heathrow alone and five to six daily flights to the US out of Gatwick.

Dublin Airport Authority, which manages Dublin, Shannon and Cork Airports, is advising passengers transiting through the UK to check in hand luggage at their airport of departure.

Aer Rianta Retail is adopting a “wait and see” attitude to the restrictions, but it is already exploring ways to overcome them should liquor and fragrance remain unavailable to US-bound travellers.

Director-Retail Frank O’Connell tells The Moodie Report: “We’re entering discussions with the airlines about whether it’s possible to sell product to passengers, then deliver it to the gates and have it put in the hold. There are practical issues about how passengers get the items back and how we might provide a packaging service. But we need to start thinking along alternative lines now, rather than accept the status quo, especially if becomes a longer term issue.”

O’Connell points out that US-bound airlines can still sell liquor and fragrance onboard. “It’s the same product, from the same source and even the same warehouse, so the implication is that there is a problem within the airside area that doesn’t apply to airlines. That makes no sense to us.”

O‘Connell is also President of the European Travel Retail Council. He said he had received numerous calls and texts from concerned retailers across the region on Thursday. “The same measures are being put in place everywhere, but as an industry we need to emphasise that it only applies to US-bound flights. We have to ensure there is no confusion.”

HAVE YOUR SAY

How should the travel retail industry react to the current crisis? How bad is it? Is this a defining moment in the trade's history? Have your say - attributed or anonymous - on The Moodie Report Forum. Comment
He added: “Very often issues come along that create uncertainty in the initial days, but that settle down then. At the same time, as an industry we can’t just sit around saying how terrible it all is. We need to be thinking about how we can overcome these situations if they become long-term problems.”

THE AMERICAS

Many airports across North, Central and South America as well as the Caribbean stopped liquids or gels in containers of any size from being brought onboard by passengers. Click here for a round-up of the situation at the region's leading airports.

The International Association of Airport Duty Free Stores is seeking clarification from the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) on whether it can alter the delivery process from airport stores to aircraft, to satisfy the new rules.

"We would still have them delivered plane-side by store employees, but packages would be put in a secure area, and customers would be allowed to pick them up when leaving the plane at their destination," said IAADFS Executive Director Michael Payne.

Vancouver International Airport Authority (YVR) Manager of Retail Leasing Gerard Lim told The Moodie Report last night: “Transborder passengers can buy duty free (including bottles but they must pack them in the checked baggage and not carry them onboard). We are dealing with the situation and I am working till 11pm today to deal with any changes in the security policy that affects our tenants.”

All US airports applied a TSA order prohibiting all liquids and gels at the screening checkpoint and onboard aircraft. This includes beverages, shampoo, perfume, sun tan lotion, cream, tooth paste, hair gel, and other items of similar consistency.

"I think they will see that duty free is not the problem. We operate in the sterile part of the airport; we are regulated and our people are badged."
Miki Dinar, President Airport Division, Duty Free Americas
Lois Pasternak’s Travel Markets Insider quoted International Shoppes Perfume Buyer Marlene Friedman confirming that its stores at New York JFK and Philadelphia airports were operational: “We are not selling liquor, fragrance or treatments, but we are open. There is not much we can do, just wait to see what happens.”

Duty Free Americas President of the Airport Division Miki Dinar told Insider: “I am telling all my managers to stay calm, and do not make any rash decisions. This bomb plot they found in the UK is a very big deal. But I think they will see that duty free is not the problem. We operate in the sterile part of the airport; we are regulated and our people are badged.”

ASIA AND AUSTRALASIA

Leading Asia Pacific airports moved swiftly to comply with the US TSA order overnight, stopping gels and liquids from being taken onboard.

Airport Authority Hong Kong urged those bound for the US to allow at least three hours for check-in and issued the following advice: “The aforementioned passengers should not carry liquid or gels in their hand baggage except for baby food, prescription medicine and other essential medical supplies. Prohibited items should be packed in check-in baggage. Passengers are also advised to travel with minimal hand baggage.”

Dow Jones reported that Japan's two main carriers, Japan Airlines and All Nippon Airlines had banned gels and liquids on US-bound flights. It also quoted a Thai Airways International spokesman saying: “Passengers should refrain from taking [onboard] liquids, electrical appliances and any kind of gel.”

Leading Japanese travel analysts Travel Journal International (TJI) Online reported today in a special bulletin that Japan's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport had not not raised its alert level. The organisation said there is no information to suggest that any threat to Japan or flights to and from Japan has increased.

TJI said: "Amid Japan's peak summer holidays, it remains unclear how this latest development will affect overseas travel to the US and Europe, seen as two of the most popular destinations this season."

Sydney Airport announced that passengers departing for the US were banned from carrying laptops and mobile phones in their hand luggage as well as liquid gels such as toothpaste, lip gloss, sunscreen. Duty free alcohol was also prohibited as carry-on luggage. Qantas applied similar measures.

The Nuance Group Chief Executive Officer Australia & New Zealand Christian Strang told The Moodie Report this morning that he was still trying to get a clear indication of restrictions from various airports in which the retailer operates.

"Airlines are applying their own restrictions," he said. "[This] will affect business. We are trying to ensure that all Australians are aware that they can purchase on return at our arrivals stores or pre-order for collection on return. [But] This alone will not solve our problem."

MEDIA REACTION – EXCERPTS FROM COVERAGE OVER THE PAST 24 HOURS

The Chicago Tribune

"Right now it is having a significant impact on our business," said Duty Free Americas' Simon Falic, "and we haven't been told how long it is going to last." Falic said the ban on liquor and fragrance sales is unfair because airlines flying international routes still can sell liquor and perfume as part of their duty-free service. He said products at his store are cleared through security in the same way duty-free products sold on board the planes are.

Duty free shoppers at US airport stores are not permitted to touch their purchase until after it is delivered to the aircraft by the duty free operator. IAADFS Executive Director Michael Payne said the organization is attempting to obtain a meeting with TSA officials to propose altering the delivery process.

"We would still have them delivered plane-side by store employees, but packages would be put in a secure area, and customers would be allowed to pick them up when leaving the plane at their destination," he said.

The Wall Street Journal Europe

"We have a strong partnership with airports around the world and we will work together to find a solution"
Ed Brennan, Chairman, DFS Group
It isn't clear how long the [product] ban will last. But it could reshape the duty free travel retail industry – a major source of revenue for companies that run duty free operations, like French luxury-goods group LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton, and for airport authorities that rent out their space.

"Alcohol, perfumes and cosmetics represent a substantial part" of the US$26 billion in overall duty free retail sales, said Michael Payne, Executive Director of the International Association of Airport Duty Free Stores in Washington, D.C.

"I believe we will be able to restore the ability to sell those product categories to departing passengers in a safe way again," said Ed Brennan, the Chairman of DFS Group. "We have a strong partnership with airports around the world and we will work together to find a solution."

Dow Jones International News

The restrictions being imposed on UK air travellers could be devastating for the airport retail industry if they are maintained in the long term, analysts said Thursday. "This is obviously bad news for the airport retail sector," said Richard Perks, retail analyst at Mintel Research, "but the damage depends how long it lasts."

Reuters

"If it's not the big news story in two days, I don't think it's going to be a big deal"
Britt Beemer, Head of America's Research Group
Britt Beemer, Head of America's Research Group, which surveys consumers, said… the impact would have been greater if the plan had not been thwarted. "If it's not the big news story in two days, I don't think it's going to be a big deal," said Beemer, speaking from an airplane via cell phone after having items such as shampoo and toothpaste confiscated before boarding a flight. "But if it is a big story in two days, it may have some impact."

"One of LVMH's biggest retail businesses is duty free so they are obviously impacted," said a London-based luxury goods analyst, who asked not to be named. "The whole sector really hurts from disruption to travel because it is estimated that about 40% of all luxury goods sales are related to tourism."

Centre for Pacific Aviation

Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation Executive Chairman Peter Harbison said: "This does mark a watershed in airport and airline security. In the past the focus has been on screening for weapons and similar implements. Here the problem has been elevated to another level, where a combination of substances can become life threatening. The main ingredient is a liquid chemical, as well as components which can be well disguised in a laptop, MP3 music player or camera.

"So it looks for the time being at least that there will be a blanket prohibition on any of these items on board – at least on flights involving the US and UK. Hand baggage will probably never be the same again – at least for UK, US flights. This promises to be a significant inconvenience for travellers, especially on long haul flights – as many flights are in the Asia Pacific region. (For the time being, only wallets and passports, in plastic see-through packets, are permitted, but laptops or MP3 music players are not).

"This could be a great inconvenience to passengers; a 15 hour flight is already a tough proposition and many passengers have their own preferred ways of passing that time, whether it is playing computer games, working on a laptop, listening to an MP3 music player, or even just reading a book.

"This imposition probably takes consumers through one more resistance level. They have already become uncomfortably aware of small seats and crowded aircraft, hassles at airports, unreliable in flight entertainment, reduced food quality, queues for fewer toilets etc.

"Although the threat appears to be very specific to the US/UK and specially to US airlines, the same logic and methodology is applicable to all air services. So we can expect that there will be lasting effects on airport security worldwide and changes in carry-on baggage rules. These will probably not be the blanket rules that are temporarily being applied, but we should expect significant lasting changes."

MARSHALLING THE INDUSTRY’S DEFENCE

More seriously, yesterday was the busiest day ever for The Moodie Report.com, attracting an incredible 6,738 page views (a +20.9% increase on our previous daily high of 5,572). We would rather it didn’t take such grim news to drive traffic but the anecdote underlines the intense industry concern and need for knowledge about the situation.

"We don’t know where every travellers’ personal items have been before they travel but we sure know where every duty free item has been"
Mark Riches, Managing Director, World Duty Free
A great deal of that traffic was generated by mainstream media such as US television channel CNBC seeking instant background on the duty free and travel retail industry.

We predicted yesterday that there would be emotional calls for the end of duty free as a result of the ban on liquids (and later gels, creams and electronics) on US-bound flights. That is already happening in some of the coverage and letters to the editor.

So how should the industry marshall its defences against any proposed longer-term crackdown? Should it say anything at all – or just lay low and hope this storm blows over as others have done? We think not.

Overall we think it has to be ready with a pro-active stance. If it does not do its own talking there is a danger that others, less knowledgeable, will do so for it.

The Duty Free World Council – and other trade associations – can play a key role here, offering strong background briefings on the merits of the industry to consumer and trade media alike (a more up-to-date website than www.dfworldcouncil.com is surely imperative right now). Individuals like World Duty Free's Mark Riches and Alpha's David King were extremely helpful yesterday, explaining in fine detail the vital minutiae of the duty free supply chain.

There’s a fine line between being alarmist and being pro-active but the reality is that duty free is today the subject of hundreds of articles across the world’s media.

Whatever consumers, and the media at large, think of duty free and travel retail, the industry’s credentials when it comes to security are actually impeccable.

As World Duty Free Managing Director Mark Riches pointed out yesterday to The Moodie Report, the airports industry is “steeped in security”, spending millions of pounds on security each year.

The duty free supply and purchasing chain is one of the most secure, regulated and compliant possible. Duty free products are initially held in bonded warehouses, delivered to airports in sealed vehicles, and those seals are checked upon the unloading of the goods. It’s a rigorous process and needs to be – after all airport retailers are under the constant scrutiny of Customs, health and safety and tax authorities. Onboard, concessionaires such as DFASS operate in the US to the highest TSA compliancy levels for both their onboard pouring and their duty free trolleys.

“We don’t know where every travellers’ personal items have been before they travel,” noted Riches, “but we sure know where every duty free item has been.”

"Duty free is one of the most highly-regulated businesses in the world"
David King, Executive Director, Alpha Airports Group
Added Alpha Airports Group Executive Director David King: “Duty free is one of the most highly-regulated businesses in the world. It’s almost all airside and it is in a highly secure zone. Everything that goes airside is security scanned.”

“We do absolutely everything by the book,” said The Nuance Group Managing Director UK and Eire John Brocklebank . “It is a totally compliant business.”

All of these senior executives went further than simply defending the sector – they each pointed out that the travel retail community actually welcomed sensible regulatory and security scrutiny.

“We have an ability as an industry to protect our travellers and we’re delighted to help,” said Brocklebank. “What happened is an example of a security system actually working well. The positive spin to the short-term disruption is that we all want a safe environment.”

Duty free, he argues, poses no threat whatsoever to that safe environment. Each of the executives spoken to understood the need for sweeping action on the day of crisis that therefore impacted on their various businesses. But they warned about any sort of knee-jerk reaction beyond that point.

As Duty Free Americas’ Miki Dinar said, “duty free is not the problem”. The danger is that it might be perceived to be, at least in part. And that perception may need to be countered.